| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What do you think of the Minotaur models? |
| AMAZING |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Good |
|
14% |
[ 4 ] |
| Okay |
|
18% |
[ 5 ] |
| Pretty Bad |
|
40% |
[ 11 ] |
| TERRIBLE |
|
22% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Lord Gargoq the Quaxocibi Saurus Cold One Rider

Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 199

 |
|
Nah, I still like them. Ugly and psycho in a cartoony way. _________________ Icecream is a dish best served cold |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juhaaha Skink WarChief
Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 518
  
       |
|
@ Fnord: Those Pumbas in WD battlereport were converted, aka not official models.
And new minotaurs are pretty good, there's a lot better pics of them in new WD. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
myara Saurus Warrior
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 48 Location: U.S.A.
   
|
|
I feel sorry for all BOC players they got plastics at the price of the most manic looking models in the range. Minotaur muscle on muscle at least they give them all hoofs instead instead of feet! Ungors plastics at least are cheap and on par for the old one.
The book at least theory hammering it seems terrible no amour saves and expensive units. I feel the older book is better at this stage, Would still rate this as top 3 worse army. if I would be extremely disappointing if I was BOC player.
GW suppose to draw us into this army. Codex and models are both disappointing for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fnord Newt

Joined: 02 Nov 2008 Posts: 288
 
          |
|
Don't judge the army yet. It's hard to actually get an accurate overview of an army by simply reading the armybook or rumors. Far too often units that look overpowered turn out to be far weaker than people first think, and usually weak units turn out to be rather good, if used right.
Take a look at wood elves, most of their units have next to no armour, low toughness and they cost a lot of points. Yet i doubt that anyone would claim that WE is a weak army. It's not DoC good, but it's still an army that is capable of dealing with most things out there. Their support magic is good (although they are not the top magic army in the game), their shooing is good (although they lack high S shooting attacks) and they are great in close combat, as long as they get to chose when and where close combat will take place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
someone2040 Thunder Lizard

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 1470 Location: South Australia
  
  |
|
Indeed, and they have some quite nice special rules.
Can gain hatred possibly any round of combat.
Minotaurs that gain more attacks as they win more combats.
Razorgors hit fast and hard.
People seem to be more wailing about the Gors who are pricey and have little armour, and how they lost skirmish on their entire army rather than looking at the positives.
Beastmen, I feel (And this is just off rumours, I haven't had the time to sit downt with the book properly) will probably sit right in the middle of things, and be a decent army.
Also, it's hard to judge them, as they are possibly written with 8th edition in mind. Who knows what things will change. _________________ Mod Rules
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lord Gargoq the Quaxocibi Saurus Cold One Rider

Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 199

 |
|
Losing skirmish I feel is a little sad, as i felt that was part of their character as roving barbarians rather than an organised force.
Still, I think the rules look promising for awesomeness _________________ Icecream is a dish best served cold |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kroak Frog

Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 576 Location: Bracebridge, Ontario
 
    |
|
How is their new magic lore? I haven't had the chance to get a hold the book yet. _________________ I am the rocks of the eternal shore. Crash against me and be broken! ~Apocalypse~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juhaaha Skink WarChief
Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 518
  
       |
|
0: Bestial Surge - Cast on a 7+, Units within 6" get d6(maybe+1)" move and cant charge with it.
1: Viletide - Cast on a 7+, 24" Range Magic Missile, 5d6 S1 Hits
2: Devolve - Cast on a 9+, Enemy units within 12" take a Leadership Test, losing wounds equal to the amount they failed by, with no Armour Save allowed.
3: Bray-Scream - Cast on a 10+, One friendly character within 12" may use a S3 Breath Weapon with no Armour Save allowed.
4: Traitor-Kin - Cast on a 10+, All enemy models within 12" riding a mount of any kind suffer a number of attacks equal to their mount's attacks, at the same Strength, with no Armour Save bonus for being mounted or barded. The same applies to the handlers of Monsters and the riders of Chariots.
5: Mantle of Ghorok - Cast on a 13+, One friendly character within 6" gains +d6S and +d6A (max 10), if one or more 6s are rolled, the character suffers a wound with no saves of any kind allowed.
6: Savage Dominion - Cast on a 16+, You may 'summon' a new Giant, Gorgon or Jabberslythe (Not Cygor), entering play at any point on a table edge and moving as if returning from pursuing an enemy off the board. While the monster is on the board, the wizard that cast this spell may not cast another spell, nor may he "dismiss" the model voluntarily, and if he dies the monster immediately disappears. Every time the monster takes a wound, the wizard must pass a Toughness Test or also suffer a wound with no saves allowed. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turmi110 Carnosaur Egg Hunter

Joined: 27 Apr 2009 Posts: 333 Location: New Zealand
 
      |
|
wow, viletide sounds like it'd be really effective against skinks, it'd force on average 6 armour saves on a skink, but only 3 armour saves on saurus's, and anything with t5 or higher is immune. Not too worried about it to be honest. I think I'd prefer 3D6 s1 with no armour saves. Traitorkin would be epic against dragons with riders, and carnosaurs, but not so much stegy's, but still, ouch! Reasonably short range though, so you probably only have to deal with it once before said mounted unit smashes into his face. Mantle of Ghorok just sounds like a random version of bears anger with the potential to be really nasty, or really ineffective. I'd like to see someone with only 2 wounds roll 2 6's, that'd be worth a laugh. Savage Dominion, I don't know what their monsters are like apart from the giant, I can say though that if that spell was cast, the shaman that did so would find some angry lizards jumping on him at the nearest opportunity. Could be nasty though, coming in from any side. 16+ and can't cast other spells though..... I don't think its that bad, you can always try dispelling it later if killing the shaman or the monster itself seems too hard.
An interesting lore, I want to see how it turns out in a few games, till then its just speculation on my part. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Warpanda Kung-Fu Panda

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 724 Location: The Edge
|
|
While I understand the "Chaos is supposed to be ugly" arguments, I have to say I've seen ugly things done prettier. Just 'cause it's Chaos doesn't mean it's allowed to lack in aesthetic merit—they're still miniatures, still works of art.
I think the Minotaurs lack cohesion and want for detail. It's as though their heads, torsos, and lower bodies were all bitz for other creatures and were glued together by a misguided newbie trying to make a custom sculpt. Although GW models have gone up a notch, they still pale before some of the other companies'. They still seem to have trouble integrating a really vibrant, distinct army style with a realistic and dynamic sculpt, and they haven't completely gotten away from the awful oven-mitts-for-hands thing.
The "twisted and overmuscled" look would have really been nice if they pulled it off. As it is, I think they should have struck by tried-and-true "bestial savagery".
Not sure about how their special rules theme the army, although I too would have liked to see Skirmish remain in some form. I almost like their lore. Almost. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StarFyre Newt
Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 625

   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyberactivity Ultimate Predator - Lord of Carnosaurs

Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Posts: 3828 Location: UK
   
    |
|
I think the Scibor's ones look fantastic.
Which ones are the best you've seen then? _________________
2010 - Year of the Shadow Toad |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StarFyre Newt
Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 625

   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Warpanda Kung-Fu Panda

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 724 Location: The Edge
|
|
Ilyad was pretty nice. Shame they went under.
(Old) Rackham had a couple nice mino sculpts. And a couple less nice sculpts ...
As with much of Rackham, opinions seem to vary wildly as to which sculpts are the nice ones and which aren't.
You can find 'em on CMON without much trouble. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyberactivity Ultimate Predator - Lord of Carnosaurs

Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Posts: 3828 Location: UK
   
    |
|
Second one is nice.
Still think that the Scibor ones are looking great. Much better than the GW effort! _________________
2010 - Year of the Shadow Toad |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|